Preparing for Life—Home Visiting Meets HHS Criteria

Model effectiveness research report last updated: 2023

Effects shown in research

Positive parenting practices

Findings rated high

Preparing for Life—Home Visiting
Show findings details
Outcome measure Effect Follow-up timing Sample Sample size Intervention group Comparison group Group difference Effect size Statistical significance Notes

Adult Adolescent Parenting Inventory 2 (AAPI-2), Belief in the use of appropriate punishment score, unweighted

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

12 months old

High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample

165 children Unadjusted mean = 6.40 Unadjusted mean = 6.29 Mean difference = 0.11 Study reported = 0.08

Not statistically significant, p = 0.59

Condon Maternal Attachment Scale, Absence of hostility score, unweighted

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

6 months old

High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample

171 children Unadjusted mean = 4.39 Unadjusted mean = 4.41 Mean difference = -0.02 Study reported = -0.04

Not statistically significant, p = 0.81

Condon Maternal Attachment Scale, Quality of attachment score, unweighted

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

6 months old

High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample

169 children Unadjusted mean = 4.70 Unadjusted mean = 4.68 Mean difference = 0.02 HomVEE calculated = 0.06

Not statistically significant, p = 0.70

Mother reads to her child every day, unweighted

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

12 months old

High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample

149 children Unadjusted proportion = 0.46 Unadjusted proportion = 0.53 Mean difference = -0.07 HomVEE calculated = -0.14

Not statistically significant, p = 0.39

Mother reads to her child, unweighted

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

12 months old

High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample

165 children Unadjusted proportion = 0.90 Unadjusted proportion = 0.90 Mean difference = 0.00 Study reported = 0.00

Not statistically significant, p = 1.00

Parental Cognition and Conduct Toward the Infant Scale (PACOTIS), Baby comparison scale score, unweighted

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

6 months old

High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample

172 children Unadjusted mean = 7.52 Unadjusted mean = 7.02 Mean difference = 0.50 Study reported = 0.26

Not statistically significant, p = 0.09

Parental Cognition and Conduct Toward the Infant Scale (PACOTIS), Parental hostile-reactive behaviors score, unweighted

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

6 months old

High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample

171 children Unadjusted mean = 0.80 Unadjusted mean = 1.06 Mean difference = -0.26 Study reported = -0.22

Not statistically significant, p = 0.15

Parental Cognition and Conduct Toward the Infant Scale (PACOTIS), Parental overprotection score, unweighted

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

6 months old

High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample

172 children Unadjusted mean = 6.18 Unadjusted mean = 6.13 Mean difference = 0.05 Study reported = 0.02

Not statistically significant, p = 0.88

Parental Cognition and Conduct Toward the Infant Scale (PACOTIS), Parental warmth score, unweighted

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

6 months old

High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample

171 children Unadjusted mean = 9.18 Unadjusted mean = 9.25 Mean difference = -0.07 Study reported = -0.06

Not statistically significant, p = 0.71

Parental Cognition and Conduct Toward the Infant Scale (PACOTIS), Perceived parental impact score, unweighted

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

6 months old

High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample

172 children Unadjusted mean = 7.25 Unadjusted mean = 7.04 Mean difference = 0.21 Study reported = 0.10

Not statistically significant, p = 0.52

Parental Locus of Control Scale (PLOC), Control of child's behavior score, unweighted

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

6 months old

High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample

173 children Unadjusted mean = 6.92 Unadjusted mean = 7.22 Mean difference = -0.30 Study reported = -0.11

Not statistically significant, p = 0.47

Preparing for Life—Home Visiting
Show findings details
Outcome measure Effect Follow-up timing Sample Sample size Intervention group Comparison group Group difference Effect size Statistical significance
Home Observation for Measurement of the Environment (HOME), Involvement scale
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
6 months old High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample 168 mothers Unadjusted mean = 4.27 Unadjusted mean = 4.41 Mean difference = -0.14 Study reported = -0.05 Not statistically significant, p= 0.80
Home Observation for Measurement of the Environment (HOME), Responsivity scale
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
6 months old High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample 165 mothers Unadjusted mean = 9.00 Unadjusted mean = 8.95 Mean difference = 0.05 Study reported = 0.08 Not statistically significant, p= 0.56
Home Observation for Measurement of the Environment (HOME), Learning Materials scale
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
6 months old High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample 168 mothers Unadjusted mean = 8.08 Unadjusted mean = 7.74 Mean difference = 0.34 Study reported = 0.29 Statistically significant, p= 0.02
Preparing for Life—Home Visiting
Show findings details
Outcome measure Effect Follow-up timing Sample Sample size Intervention group Comparison group Group difference Effect size Statistical significance Notes

Appropriateness of baby sleeping location

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

6 months old

High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample

173 mother/child dyads Unadjusted proportion = 0.90 Unadjusted proportion = 0.99 Mean difference = -0.09 Study reported = -0.39

Statistically significant, p = 0.03

Authors' reported effect size is Cohen's d

Baby has appropriate sleep preparation

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

6 months old

High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample

173 mother/child dyads Unadjusted proportion = 0.48 Unadjusted proportion = 0.39 Mean difference = 0.09 Study reported = 0.19

Not statistically significant, p = 0.24

Authors' reported effect size is Cohen's d

Condon Maternal Attachment Scale (CMAS), Absence of Hostility

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

6 months old

High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample

173 mother/child dyads Unadjusted mean = 4.39 Unadjusted mean = 4.41 Mean difference = -0.02 Study reported = -0.04

Not statistically significant, p = 0.80

Authors' reported effect size is Cohen's d

Condon Maternal Attachment Scale (CMAS), Quality of Attachment

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

6 months old

High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample

173 mother/child dyads Unadjusted mean = 4.69 Unadjusted mean = 4.68 Mean difference = 0.01 Study reported = 0.03

Not statistically significant, p = 0.85

Authors' reported effect size is Cohen's d

Condon Maternal Attachment Scale (CMAS), total score

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

6 months old

High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample

173 mother/child dyads Unadjusted mean = 85.86 Unadjusted mean = 85.92 Mean difference = -0.06 Study reported = -0.01

Not statistically significant, p = 0.94

Authors' reported effect size is Cohen's d

Mother interaction with baby (items adapted from My Baby and Me program and Parenting for the First Time program)

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

6 months old

High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample

173 mother/child dyads Unadjusted mean = 2.79 Unadjusted mean = 2.66 Mean difference = 0.13 Study reported = 0.22

Not statistically significant, p = 0.14

Authors' reported effect size is Cohen's d

Mother uses baby safety gate

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

6 months old

High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample

151 mother/child dyads Unadjusted proportion = 0.19 Unadjusted proportion = 0.13 Mean difference = 0.06 Study reported = 0.15

Not statistically significant, p = 0.32

Authors' reported effect size is Cohen's d

Mother uses electrical socket covers

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

6 months old

High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample

168 mother/child dyads Unadjusted proportion = 0.43 Unadjusted proportion = 0.33 Mean difference = 0.10 Study reported = 0.20

Not statistically significant, p = 0.18

Authors' reported effect size is Cohen's d

Parental Cognition and Conduct Toward the Infant Scale (PACOTIS), Baby Comparison

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

6 months old

High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample

173 mother/child dyads Unadjusted mean = 7.52 Unadjusted mean = 7.04 Mean difference = 0.48 Study reported = 0.26

Not statistically significant, p = 0.10

Authors' reported effect size is Cohen's d

Parental Cognition and Conduct Toward the Infant Scale (PACOTIS), Parental Hostile-reactive Behavior

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

6 months old

High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample

173 mother/child dyads Unadjusted mean = 0.80 Unadjusted mean = 1.04 Mean difference = -0.24 Study reported = -0.20

Not statistically significant, p = 0.18

Authors' reported effect size is Cohen's d

Parental Cognition and Conduct Toward the Infant Scale (PACOTIS), Parental Impact

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

6 months old

High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample

173 mother/child dyads Unadjusted mean = 7.25 Unadjusted mean = 7.07 Mean difference = 0.18 Study reported = 0.08

Not statistically significant, p = 0.58

Authors' reported effect size is Cohen's d

Parental Cognition and Conduct Toward the Infant Scale (PACOTIS), Parental Over-protection

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

6 months old

High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample

173 mother/child dyads Unadjusted mean = 6.18 Unadjusted mean = 6.14 Mean difference = 0.04 Study reported = 0.02

Not statistically significant, p = 0.90

Authors' reported effect size is Cohen's d

Parental Cognition and Conduct Toward the Infant Scale (PACOTIS), Parental Self-efficacy

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

6 months old

High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample

173 mother/child dyads Unadjusted mean = 8.80 Unadjusted mean = 8.67 Mean difference = 0.13 Study reported = 0.10

Not statistically significant, p = 0.47

Authors' reported effect size is Cohen's d

Parental Cognition and Conduct Toward the Infant Scale (PACOTIS), Parental Warmth

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

6 months old

High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample

173 mother/child dyads Unadjusted mean = 9.18 Unadjusted mean = 9.24 Mean difference = -0.06 Study reported = -0.06

Not statistically significant, p = 0.75

Authors' reported effect size is Cohen's d

Parental Locus of Control Scale (PLOC), overall score

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

6 months old

High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample

173 mother/child dyads Unadjusted mean = 44.27 Unadjusted mean = 45.54 Mean difference = -1.27 Study reported = -0.16

Not statistically significant, p = 0.29

Authors' reported effect size is Cohen's d

Parental Locus of Control Scale (PLOC), Parental Belief in Fate/Chance

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

6 months old

High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample

173 mother/child dyads Unadjusted mean = 9.70 Unadjusted mean = 9.97 Mean difference = -0.27 Study reported = -0.08

Not statistically significant, p = 0.61

Authors' reported effect size is Cohen's d

Satisfied with father's involvement

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

6 months old

High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample

173 mother/child dyads Unadjusted mean = 62.26 Unadjusted mean = 64.40 Mean difference = -2.14 Study reported = -0.25

Not statistically significant, p = 0.11

Authors' reported effect size is Cohen's d
Preparing for Life—Home Visiting
Show findings details
Outcome measure Effect Follow-up timing Sample Sample size Intervention group Comparison group Group difference Effect size Statistical significance Notes

Adult Adolescent Parenting Inventory 2 (AAPI), Appropriate parent-child roles

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

12 months old

High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample

165 mothers Unadjusted mean = 6.11 Unadjusted mean = 6.07 Mean difference = 0.04 Study reported = 0.02

Not statistically significant, p = 0.91

Authors' reported effect size is Cohen's d

Adult Adolescent Parenting Inventory 2 (AAPI), Belief in the use of inappropriate punishment- At risk cut-off

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

12 months old

High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample

165 mothers Unadjusted proportion = 0.00 Unadjusted proportion = 0.02 Mean difference = -0.02 Study reported = -0.22

Not statistically significant, p = 0.63

Authors' reported effect size is Cohen's d

Adult Adolescent Parenting Inventory 2 (AAPI), Inappropriate parent-child roles- At risk cut-off

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

12 months old

High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample

165 mothers Unadjusted proportion = 0.12 Unadjusted proportion = 0.12 Mean difference = 0.00 Study reported = 0.00

Not statistically significant, p = 1.00

Authors' reported effect size is Cohen's d

Adult Adolescent Parenting Inventory 2 (AAPI), Parental empathy

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

12 months old

High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample

165 mothers Unadjusted mean = 4.93 Unadjusted mean = 4.92 Mean difference = 0.01 Study reported = 0.01

Not statistically significant, p = 0.98

Authors' reported effect size is Cohen's d

Adult Adolescent Parenting Inventory 2 (AAPI), Parental lack of empathy- At risk of cut-off

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

12 months old

High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample

165 mothers Unadjusted proportion = 0.34 Unadjusted proportion = 0.24 Mean difference = 0.10 Study reported = 0.22

Not statistically significant, p = 0.16

Authors' reported effect size is Cohen's d

Adult Adolescent Parenting Inventory 2 (AAPI), Realistic parental expectations of children

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

12 months old

High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample

165 mothers Unadjusted mean = 6.62 Unadjusted mean = 6.46 Mean difference = 0.16 Study reported = 0.09

Not statistically significant, p = 0.59

Authors' reported effect size is Cohen's d

Adult Adolescent Parenting Inventory 2 (AAPI), total number of scales at risk

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

12 months old

High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample

165 mothers Unadjusted mean = 0.76 Unadjusted mean = 0.76 Mean difference = 0.00 Study reported = 0.00

Not statistically significant, p = 1.00

Authors' reported effect size is Cohen's d

Adult Adolescent Parenting Inventory 2 (AAPI), Total score

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

12 months old

High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample

165 mothers Unadjusted mean = 124.18 Unadjusted mean = 125.71 Mean difference = -1.53 Study reported = -0.11

Not statistically significant, p = 0.47

Authors' reported effect size is Cohen's d

Adult Adolescent Parenting Inventory 2 (AAPI), Unrealistic parental expectations of children- At risk cut-off

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

12 months old

High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample

165 mothers Unadjusted proportion = 0.06 Unadjusted proportion = 0.05 Mean difference = 0.01 Study reported = 0.06

Not statistically significant, p = 0.78

Authors' reported effect size is Cohen's d

Adult-Adolescent Parenting Inventory (AAPI), Appropriate parent-child roles, difference-in-difference estimate

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

12 months old

High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample

165 mothers Unadjusted mean = 28.04 Unadjusted mean = 27.78 Mean difference = 0.26 HomVEE calculated = -0.08

Not statistically significant, p = 0.59

Authors' reported effect size is Cohen's d

Adult-Adolescent Parenting Inventory (AAPI), Belief in the use of appropriate punishment, difference-in-difference estimate

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

12 months old

High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample

165 mothers Unadjusted mean = 45.84 Unadjusted mean = 45.14 Mean difference = 0.70 HomVEE calculated = 0.30

Not statistically significant, p = 0.054

Authors' reported effect size is Cohen's d

Adult-Adolescent Parenting Inventory (AAPI), Belief in the use of inappropriate punishment- At risk cut-off, difference-in-difference estimate

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

12 months old

High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample

165 mothers Unadjusted mean = 0.00 Unadjusted mean = 0.02 Mean difference = -0.02 HomVEE calculated = 0.19

Not statistically significant, p = 0.23

Authors' reported effect size is Cohen's d

Adult-Adolescent Parenting Inventory (AAPI), Inappropriate parent-child roles- At risk cut-off, difference-in-difference estimate

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

12 months old

High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample

165 mothers Unadjusted mean = 0.12 Unadjusted mean = 0.12 Mean difference = 0.00 HomVEE calculated = 0.15

Not statistically significant, p = 0.33

Authors' reported effect size is Cohen's d

Adult-Adolescent Parenting Inventory (AAPI), Parental empathy, difference-in-difference estimate

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

12 months old

High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample

165 mothers Unadjusted mean = 39.65 Unadjusted mean = 39.52 Mean difference = 0.13 HomVEE calculated = -0.06

Not statistically significant, p = 0.69

Authors' reported effect size is Cohen's d

Adult-Adolescent Parenting Inventory (AAPI), Parental lack of empathy- At risk of cut-off, difference-in-difference estimate

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

12 months old

High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample

165 mothers Unadjusted mean = 0.34 Unadjusted mean = 0.24 Mean difference = 0.10 Study reported = 0.33

Statistically significant, p = 0.04

Authors' reported effect size is Cohen's d

Adult-Adolescent Parenting Inventory (AAPI), Realistic parental expectations of children, difference-in-difference estimate

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

12 months old

High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample

165 mothers Unadjusted mean = 25.17 Unadjusted mean = 24.64 Mean difference = 0.53 HomVEE calculated = -0.10

Not statistically significant, p = 0.52

Authors' reported effect size is Cohen's d

Adult-Adolescent Parenting Inventory (AAPI), Unrealistic parental expectations of children- At risk cut-off, difference-in-difference estimate

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

12 months old

High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample

165 mothers Unadjusted mean = 0.06 Unadjusted mean = 0.05 Mean difference = 0.01 Study reported = 0.35

Statistically significant, p = 0.03

Authors' reported effect size is Cohen's d

Appropriateness of sleeping location

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

12 months old

High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample

162 children Unadjusted proportion = 0.87 Unadjusted proportion = 0.95 Mean difference = -0.08 Study reported = -0.30

Not statistically significant, p = 0.09

Authors' reported effect size is Cohen's d

Family Environment Scale (FES), Cohesion Standard Score

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

12 months old

High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample

165 children Unadjusted mean = 55.51 Unadjusted mean = 58.07 Mean difference = -2.56 Study reported = -0.27

Not statistically significant, p = 0.08

Authors' reported effect size is Cohen's d

Family Environment Scale (FES), Conflict Standard Score

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

12 months old

High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample

165 children Unadjusted mean = 70.43 Unadjusted mean = 69.63 Mean difference = 0.80 Study reported = 0.09

Not statistically significant, p = 0.57

Authors' reported effect size is Cohen's d

Family Environment Scale (FES), Organisation Standard Score

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

12 months old

High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample

165 children Unadjusted mean = 48.15 Unadjusted mean = 46.88 Mean difference = 1.27 Study reported = 0.14

Not statistically significant, p = 0.37

Authors' reported effect size is Cohen's d

Father has daily contact with child

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

12 months old

High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample

164 children Unadjusted proportion = 0.68 Unadjusted proportion = 0.67 Mean difference = 0.01 Study reported = 0.01

Not statistically significant, p = 0.89

Authors' reported effect size is Cohen's d

Father part of child's life

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

12 months old

High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample

164 children Unadjusted proportion = 0.94 Unadjusted proportion = 0.89 Mean difference = 0.05 Study reported = 0.17

Not statistically significant, p = 0.26

Authors' reported effect size is Cohen's d

Satisfied with father's involvement

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

12 months old

High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample

165 mothers Unadjusted mean = 62.91 Unadjusted mean = 62.54 Mean difference = 0.37 Study reported = 0.04

Not statistically significant, p = 0.78

Authors' reported effect size is Cohen's d
Preparing for Life—Home Visiting
Show findings details
Outcome measure Effect Follow-up timing Sample Sample size Intervention group Comparison group Group difference Effect size Statistical significance Notes

Condon Maternal Attachment Scale (CMAS): Absence of hostility

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

24 months old

High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample

165 mothers and children Unadjusted mean = 4.36 Unadjusted mean = 4.40 Mean difference = -0.04 Study reported = -0.06

Not statistically significant, p = 0.63

Condon Maternal Attachment Scale (CMAS): Quality of attachment

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

24 months old

High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample

165 mothers and children Unadjusted mean = 4.61 Unadjusted mean = 4.57 Mean difference = 0.04 Study reported = 0.12

Not statistically significant, p = 0.50

Condon Maternal Attachment Scale (CMAS): Total score

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

24 months old

High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample

165 mothers and children Unadjusted mean = 84.16 Unadjusted mean = 84.03 Mean difference = 0.13 Study reported = 0.02

Not statistically significant, p = 0.89

Father has contact with child daily

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

24 months old

High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample

163 mothers and children Unadjusted proportion = 0.66 Unadjusted proportion = 0.69 Mean difference = -0.03 Study reported = -0.05

Not statistically significant, p = 0.68

Parental Cognition and Conduct Toward the Infant Scale (PACOTIS): Baby comparison score

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

24 months old

High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample

165 mothers and children Unadjusted mean = 7.04 Unadjusted mean = 6.41 Mean difference = 0.63 Study reported = 0.29

Not statistically significant, p = 0.07

Parental Cognition and Conduct Toward the Infant Scale (PACOTIS): Parental hostile-reactive behavior

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

24 months old

High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample

165 mothers and children Unadjusted mean = 1.78 Unadjusted mean = 1.94 Mean difference = -0.16 Study reported = -0.10

Not statistically significant, p = 0.51

Parental Cognition and Conduct Toward the Infant Scale (PACOTIS): Parental impact

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

24 months old

High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample

165 mothers and children Unadjusted mean = 7.97 Unadjusted mean = 7.50 Mean difference = 0.47 Study reported = 0.20

Not statistically significant, p = 0.21

Parental Cognition and Conduct Toward the Infant Scale (PACOTIS): Parental over-protection

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

24 months old

High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample

165 mothers and children Unadjusted mean = 4.49 Unadjusted mean = 4.23 Mean difference = 0.26 Study reported = 0.12

Not statistically significant, p = 0.45

Parental Cognition and Conduct Toward the Infant Scale (PACOTIS): Parental self efficacy

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

24 months old

High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample

165 mothers and children Unadjusted mean = 8.74 Unadjusted mean = 8.42 Mean difference = 0.32 Study reported = 0.29

Not statistically significant, p = 0.07

Parental Cognition and Conduct Toward the Infant Scale (PACOTIS): Parental warmth

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

24 months old

High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample

165 mothers and children Unadjusted mean = 8.69 Unadjusted mean = 8.48 Mean difference = 0.21 Study reported = 0.15

Not statistically significant, p = 0.36

View Revisions